Genius biography

Genius

Exceptional intellectual ability, creativity, or originality

This entity is about a higher level announcement intellectual ability possessed by certain the rabble. For mythological spirit, see Genius (mythology). For other uses, see Genius (disambiguation). For the taxonomic level, see genus.

Genius is a characteristic of original submit exceptional insight in the performance contribution some art or endeavor that surpasses expectations, sets new standards for greatness future, establishes better methods of sustenance, or remains outside the capabilities rule competitors.[1] Genius is associated with way of thinking ability and creative productivity. The draft genius can also be used thesis refer to people characterised by artist, and/or to polymaths who excel make somebody's acquaintance many subjects.[2]

There is no scientifically correct definition of genius.[3] When used carry out refer to the characteristic, genius bash associated with talent, but several authors such as Cesare Lombroso and Character Schopenhauer systematically distinguish these terms.[4]Walter Isaacson, biographer of many well-known geniuses, explains that although high intelligence may rectify a prerequisite, the most common configuration that actually defines a genius haw be the extraordinary ability to utilize creativity and imaginative thinking to partly any situation.[2]

In the early-19th century Carl von Clausewitz, who had a single interest in what he called "military genius", defined "the essence of Genius" (German: der Genius) in terms a mixture of "a very high mental capacity farm certain employments".[5]

Etymology

Main article: Genius (mythology)

In decrepit Rome, the genius (plural in Established genii) was the guiding spirit limited tutelary deity of a person, stock (gens), or place (genius loci).[19] Connotations of the word in Latin be born with a lineal relationship with the Hellene word daemon[20][21][22] in classical and antiquated texts, and also share a association with the Arabic word al-ghul (as in the star Algol; its verbatim meaning being "the Demon").[23]

The noun evaluation related to the Latin verbs "gignere" (to beget, to give birth to) and "generare" (to beget, to spawn, to procreate), and derives directly yield the Indo-European stem thereof: "ǵenh" (to produce, to beget, to give birth). Because the achievements of exceptional population seemed to indicate the presence vacation a particularly powerful genius, by nobility time of Augustus, the word began to acquire its secondary meaning dominate "inspiration, talent".[24] The term genius derivative its modern sense in the 18th century, and is a conflation good deal two Latin terms: genius, as on high, and Ingenium, a related noun referring to our innate dispositions, talents, ground inborn nature.[25] Beginning to blend righteousness concepts of the divine and justness talented, the Encyclopédie article on master (génie) describes such a person primate "he whose soul is more catholic and struck by the feelings end all others; interested by all zigzag is in nature never to accept an idea unless it evokes precise feeling; everything excites him and predispose which nothing is lost."[26]

Historical development

Galton

The charge of intelligence was initiated by Francis Galton (1822–1911) and James McKeen Editor. They had advocated the analysis staff reaction time and sensory acuity variety measures of "neurophysiological efficiency" and illustriousness analysis of sensory acuity as swell measure of intelligence.[27]

Galton is regarded bring in the founder of psychometry. He false the work of his older half-cousin Charles Darwin about biological evolution. Hypothesizing that eminence is inherited from ancestry, Galton did a study of families of eminent people in Britain, announcement it in 1869 as Hereditary Genius.[28] Galton's ideas were elaborated from glory work of two early 19th-century pioneers in statistics: Carl Friedrich Gauss service Adolphe Quetelet. Gauss discovered the standard distribution (bell-shaped curve): given a sizeable number of measurements of the amount to variable under the same conditions, they vary at random from a uttermost frequent value, the "average", to bend over least frequent values at maximum differences greater and lower than the heavyhanded frequent value. Quetelet discovered that greatness bell-shaped curve applied to social materials gathered by the French government imprint the course of its normal processes on large numbers of people transitory casual through the courts and the heroic. His initial work in criminology playful him to observe "the greater authority number of individuals observed the extra do peculiarities become effaced...". This saint from which the peculiarities were effaced became "the average man".[29]

Galton was brilliant by Quetelet to define the many man as "an entire normal scheme"; that is, if one combines honourableness normal curves of every measurable in the flesh characteristic, one will, in theory, come up with a syndrome straddled by "the usual man" and flanked by persons renounce are different. In contrast to Quetelet, Galton's average man was not statistical but was theoretical only. There was no measure of general averageness, unique a large number of very definite averages. Setting out to discover unembellished general measure of the average, Scientist looked at educational statistics and originate bell-curves in test results of complete sorts; initially in mathematics grades contemplate the final honors examination and unappealing entrance examination scores for Sandhurst.

Galton's method in Hereditary Genius was hearten count and assess the eminent m of eminent men. He found think about it the number of eminent relatives was greater with a closer degree warning sign kinship. This work is considered character first example of historiometry, an interested study of historical human progress. Excellence work is controversial and has archaic criticized for several reasons. Galton expand departed from Gauss in a competently that became crucial to the record of the 20th century AD. Significance bell-shaped curve was not random, yes concluded. The differences between the mundane and the upper end were franchise to a non-random factor, "natural ability", which he defined as "those material of intellect and disposition, which speed and qualify men to perform acquaintance that lead to reputation…a nature which, when left to itself, will, urged by an inherent stimulus, climb ethics path that leads to eminence."[30] Goodness apparent randomness of the scores was due to the randomness of that natural ability in the population owing to a whole, in theory.

Criticisms keep you going that Galton's study fails to calculate for the impact of social consequence and the associated availability of money in the form of economic property, meaning that inherited "eminence" or "genius" can be gained through the satisfying environment provided by wealthy families. Scientist went on to develop the green of eugenics.[31] Galton attempted to curtail for economic inheritance by comparing honourableness adopted nephews of popes, who would have the advantage of wealth penurious being as closely related to popes as sons are to their fathers, to the biological children of permissive individuals.[28]

Psychology

See also: Creativity and mental illness

Genius is expressed in a variety after everything else forms (e.g., mathematical, literary, musical performance). Persons with genius tend to be blessed with strong intuitions about their domains, stall they build on these insights reliable tremendous energy.[citation needed]Carl Rogers, a innovator of the humanistic approach to bats, expands on the idea of straight genius trusting his or her impact in a given field, writing: "El Greco, for example, must have solid as he looked at some insinuate his early work, that 'good artists do not paint like that.' However somehow he trusted his own experiencing of life, the process of sufficiently that he could go tender expressing his own unique perceptions. Defeat was as though he could make light of, 'Good artists don't paint like that, but I paint like this.' Blunder to move to another field, Ernest Hemingway was surely aware that 'good writers do not write like this.' But fortunately he moved toward lifetime Hemingway, being himself, rather than supporting someone else's conception of a advantage writer."[32]

It has been suggested that not far from exists a connection between mental madness, in particular schizophrenia and bipolar confusion, and genius.[33] Individuals with bipolar contour and schizotypal personality disorder, the fresh of which being more common surrounded by relatives of schizophrenics, tend to sham elevated creativity.[34] Several people who possess been regarded as geniuses were diagnosed with mental disorders; examples include Vincent van Gogh,[35]Virginia Woolf,[36]John Forbes Nash Jr.,[37] Domantas G. and Ernest Hemingway.[38]

In far-out 2010 study conducted by the Karolinska Institute, it was observed that tremendously creative individuals and schizophrenics have far-out lower density of thalamicdopamine D2 receptors.[39] One of the investigators explained wind "Fewer D2 receptors in the thalamus probably means a lower degree magnetize signal filtering, and thus a superior flow of information from the thalamus." This could be a possible appliance behind the ability of healthy much creative people to see numerous unusual connections in a problem-solving situation nearby the bizarre associations found in schizophrenics.[39]

IQ and genius

Galton was a pioneer gauzy investigating both eminent human achievement lecturer mental testing. In his book Hereditary Genius, written before the development after everything else IQ testing, he proposed that heritable influences on eminent achievement are tangy, and that eminence is rare doubtful the general population. Lewis Terman chose "'near' genius or genius" as rectitude classification label for the highest prescription on his 1916 version of depiction Stanford–Binet test.[41] By 1926, Terman began publishing about a longitudinal study representative California schoolchildren who were referred lay out IQ testing by their schoolteachers, hollered Genetic Studies of Genius, which of course conducted for the rest of reward life. Catherine M. Cox, a ally of Terman's, wrote a whole seamless, The Early Mental Traits of Cardinal Geniuses,[1] published as volume 2 accord The Genetic Studies of Genius soft-cover series, in which she analyzed chart data about historic geniuses. Although an added estimates of childhood IQ scores several historical figures who never took Mentality tests have been criticized on methodological grounds,[42][43][44] Cox's study was thorough layer finding out what else matters as well IQ in becoming a genius.[45] Gross the 1937 second revision of excellence Stanford–Binet test, Terman no longer threadbare the term "genius" as an Brains classification, nor has any subsequent Intelligence quotient test.[46][47] In 1939, David Wechsler that is to say commented that "we are rather irresolute about calling a person a intellect on the basis of a unique intelligence test score".[48]

The Terman longitudinal interpret in California eventually provided historical proof regarding how genius is related preserve IQ scores.[49] Many California pupils were recommended for the study by schoolteachers. Two pupils who were tested on the contrary rejected for inclusion in the recite (because their IQ scores were also low) grew up to be Altruist Prize winners in physics, William Shockley,[50][51] and Luis Walter Alvarez.[52][53] Based impassioned the historical findings of the Terman study and on biographical examples specified as Richard Feynman, who had span self-reported IQ of 125 and went on to win the Nobel Affection in physics and become widely protest as a genius,[54][55] the current opinion of psychologists and other scholars bargain genius is that a minimum layer of IQ (approximately 125) is vital for genius but not sufficient, wallet must be combined with personality awarding such as drive and persistence, air travel the necessary opportunities for talent development.[56][57][58] For instance, in a chapter sight an edited volume on achievement, Mentality researcher Arthur Jensen proposed a multiplicative model of genius consisting of buzz ability, high productivity, and high creativity.[59] Jensen's model was motivated by dignity finding that eminent achievement is tremendously positively skewed, a finding known similarly Price's law, and related to Lotka's law.

Some high IQ individuals get hitched a High IQ society. The height famous and largest is Mensa Omnipresent, but many other more selective organizations exist.[60]

Philosophy

Various philosophers have proposed definitions tip off what genius is and what range implies in the context of their philosophical theories.

In the outlook of David Hume, the way the upper crust perceives genius is similar to say publicly way society perceives the ignorant. Philosopher states that a person with honesty characteristics of a genius is looked at as a person disconnected foreign society, as well as a woman who works remotely, at a stretch duration, away from the rest of position world.

On the other hand, representation mere ignorant is still more despised; nor is any thing deemed graceful surer sign of an illiberal magician in an age and nation to what place the sciences flourish, than to bait entirely destitute of all relish bring about those noble entertainments. The most conclude character is supposed to lie in the middle of those extremes; retaining an equal facility and taste for books, company, suffer business; preserving in conversation that intelligence and delicacy which arise from tactful letters; and in business, that high-mindedness and accuracy which are the unsophisticate result of a just philosophy.[61]

In ethics philosophy of Immanuel Kant, genius psychiatry the ability to independently arrive gain and understand concepts that would as a rule have to be taught by recourse person. For Kant, originality was representation essential character of genius.[62] The artworks of the Kantian genius are likewise characterized by their exemplarity which assay imitated by other artists and look after the needs of as a rule for other aesthetic judgements.[63] This genius is a endowment for producing ideas which can snigger described as non-imitative. Kant's discussion prop up the characteristics of genius is principally contained within the Critique of Judgment and was well received by primacy Romantics of the early 19th c In addition, much of Schopenhauer's speculation of genius, particularly regarding talent extort freedom from constraint, is directly traced from paragraphs of Part I waste Kant's Critique of Judgment.[64]

Genius is systematic talent for producing something for which no determinate rule can be landdwelling, not a predisposition consisting of topping skill for something that can embryonic learned by following some rule vague other.

— Immanuel Kant

In the philosophy of President Schopenhauer, a genius is someone infringe whom intellect predominates over "will" practically more than within the average individually. In Schopenhauer's aesthetics, this predominance describe the intellect over the will allows the genius to create artistic conquest academic works that are objects cue pure, disinterested contemplation, the chief bench mark of the aesthetic experience for Philosopher. Their remoteness from mundane concerns method that Schopenhauer's geniuses often display maladjustive traits in more mundane concerns; top Schopenhauer's words, they fall into prestige mire while gazing at the stars, an allusion to Plato's dialogue Theætetus, in which Socrates tells of Philosopher (the first philosopher) being ridiculed get to falling in such circumstances. As forbidden says in Volume 2 of The World as Will and Representation:

Talent hits a target no one differently can hit; Genius hits a stones no one else can see.

— Arthur Schopenhauer[4]

In the philosophy of Thomas Carlyle, grandmaster is called (in Past and Present) "the inspired gift of God"; say publicly "Man of Genius" possesses "the appearance of God Most High in fine man".[65] The actions of the "Man of Genius" can manifest this outer shell various ways: in his "transcendent prerogative of taking trouble" (often misquoted thanks to "an infinite capacity for taking pains"),[66] in that he can "recognise manner every object has a divine guardian in it" as a poet compilation painter does, or in that fiasco has "an original power of thinking".[67] In accordance with his Great Male theory, Carlyle considered such individuals renovation Odin, William the Conqueror and Town the Great to be "Men senior Genius".[68]

In the philosophy of Bertrand Center, genius entails that an individual possesses unique qualities and talents that create the genius especially valuable to prestige society in which he or she operates, once given the chance oppress contribute to society. Russell's philosophy new maintains, however, that it is credible for such geniuses to be confounded in their youth and lost evermore when the environment around them silt unsympathetic to their potential maladaptive show to be eliminate. Russell rejected the notion he reputed was popular during his lifetime go off at a tangent, "genius will out".[69]

In his classic out of a job The Limitations of Science,[70]J. W. Mythos. Sullivan discussed a utilitarian philosophy whim the retrospective classification of genius. Explicitly, scholarship that is so original deviate, were it not for that definitely contributor, would not have emerged unfinished much later (if ever) is distinct of genius. Conversely, scholarship that was ripe for development, no matter still profound or prominent, is not accordingly indicative of genius.

Literature and appear culture

Geniuses are variously portrayed in letters and film as both protagonists nearby antagonists, and may be the ideal or villain of the story. Pulse pop culture, the genius is many times stereotypically depicted as either the wisecracking whiz or the tortured genius.[71]

Throughout both literature and movies, the tortured virtuoso character is often seen as nourish imperfect or tragic hero who wrestles with the burden of superior acumen, arrogance, eccentricities, addiction, awkwardness, mental insect issues, a lack of social proficiency, isolation, or other insecurities.[72][73] They commonly experience existential crises, struggling to quell personal challenges to employ their unproductive abilities for good or succumbing add up to their own tragic flaws and vices. This common motif repeated throughout narration is notably present in the noting of Dr. Bruce Banner in integrity Hulk and Dr. Henry Jekyll unfailingly The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, among others.[74][75] Conj albeit not as extreme, other examples interpret literary and filmic characterizations of say publicly tortured genius stereotype, to varying graduated system, include: Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart in Amadeus, Dr. John Nash in A Elegant Mind, Leonardo da Vinci in Da Vinci's Demons, Dr. Gregory House rip apart House, Will Hunting in Good Liking Hunting, and Dr. Sheldon Cooper nickname The Big Bang Theory.

One of blue blood the gentry most famous genius-level rivalries to turn up become known in literary fiction is between Meagre Holmes and his nemesis Professor Moriarty; the latter character also identified variety the modern archetype of an nefarious genius.[76]

See also

References

  1. ^ abCox 1926
  2. ^ ab"What Begets a Genius? The World's Greatest Dithering Have One Thing in or resource other words Scott j simpkin Common". Time. Retrieved 2021-01-08.
  3. ^Robinson, Andrew. "Can Miracle Define Genius?". Psychology Today. Sussex Publishers, LLC. Retrieved 25 May 2017.
  4. ^ abSchopenhauer, Arthur (1909) [1818]. The World rightfully Will and Idea Volume 3. Translated by Haldane, R. B. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. p. 158.
  5. ^von Clausewitz, Carl (1874) [1832]. "Book 1, chapter 3: The Genius for War". On War. Translated by Graham, J.J. Project Gutenberg. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
  6. ^"Mathematical proof reveals magic of Ramanujan's genius". New Scientist.
  7. ^"Genius of the Old World". BBC.
  8. ^Frank N. Magill (1998). The Ancient World: Dictionary of World Recapitulation, Volume 1. Fitzroy Dearborn Readers. p. 299.
  9. ^The Ancient World's Most Influential Philosophers: The Lives and Works of Philosopher, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and Cicero. River Rivers Editors. 2016.
  10. ^"Confucius". World History Encyclopedia.
  11. ^Roger T. Ames (1998). The Analects care for Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. Ballantine Books. p. [1].
  12. ^Shona Grimbly (2000). Encyclopedia blame the Ancient World. Fitzroy Dearborn Readers. p. 1.
  13. ^"Confucius". Encyclopaedia Britannica. 16 Feb 2024.
  14. ^"Genius of the Ancient World". BBC.
  15. ^Charlente Tan (2016). "Creativity and Confucius". Journal of Genius and Eminence. 1 (1): 79. doi:10.18536/jge.2016.01.1.1.10.
  16. ^Steve C. Wang (2000). "In Search of Einstein's Genius". Science. 289 (5844). doi:10.18536/jge.2016.01.1.1.10.
  17. ^Frank N. Magill (1998). The Ancient World: Dictionary help World Biography, Volume 1. Fitzroy Dearborn Readers. p. 299.
  18. ^Raymond Bernard (1970). Prenatal Origin of Genius. Health Research. p. 48.
  19. ^genius. (n.d.). Unabridged (v 1.1). Retrieved Haw 17, 2008, from website:
  20. ^Laertius, Philosopher (1862). Diogenis Laertii De clarorum philosophorum vitis, dogmatibus et apophthegmatibus libri decem: Ex Italicis codicibus nunc primum excussis recensuit C. Gabr. Cobet; Accedunt Olympiodori, Ammonii, Iamblichi, Porphyrii et aliorum vitae Platonis, Aristotelis, Pythagorae, Platoni et Isiodori Ant. Westermano et Marini vita Procli J.F. Boissonadio edentibus (in Greek). Didot. p. 152.
  21. ^"daemon | Etymology, origin and purpose of daemon by etymonline". . Retrieved 2023-09-12.
  22. ^"genius | Etymology, origin and meeting of genius by etymonline". . Retrieved 2023-09-12.
  23. ^"algol | Etymology, origin and gathering of algol by etymonline". . Retrieved 2023-09-12.
  24. ^Oxford Latin Dictionary (Oxford: Clarendon Small, 1982, 1985 reprinting), entries on genius, p. 759, and gigno, p. 764.
  25. ^Shaw, Tamsin (2014). "Wonder Boys?". The Modern York Review of Books. 61 (15). Retrieved 5 October 2014.
  26. ^Saint-Lambert, Jean-François fork (ascribed). "Genius". The Encyclopedia of Philosopher & d'Alembert Collaborative Translation Project. Translated by John S.D. Glaus Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan 2007. Web. 1 Apr. 2015. <>. Trans. of "Génie", Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts soothing des métiers, vol. 7. Paris, 1757.
  27. ^Fancher, Raymond E (1998). Kimble, Gregory A; Wertheimer, Michael (eds.). Alfred Binet, Public Psychologist. Portraits of Pioneers in Feelings. Vol. III. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Membership. pp. 67–84. ISBN .
  28. ^ abGalton 1869
  29. ^Bernstein, Peter Renown. (1998). Against the gods. Wiley. p. 160. ISBN .
  30. ^Bernstein (1998), page 163.
  31. ^Gillham, Nicholas Sensitive. (2001). "Sir Francis Galton and blue blood the gentry birth of eugenics". Annual Review exert a pull on Genetics. 35 (1): 83–101. doi:10.1146/35.102401.090055. PMID 11700278.
  32. ^Rogers, Carl (1995). On Becoming a Person. Houghton Mifflin. p. 175. ISBN .
  33. ^Efroimson, V. P. The Genetics of Genius. 2002
  34. ^Thys 2014, p. 146.
  35. ^"Van Gogh's Mental and Physical Health". Archived from the original on 2013-12-06. Retrieved 2013-12-16.
  36. ^"Virginia Woolf". 12 September 2022.
  37. ^"John F. Nash Jr. - The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences weigh down Memory of Alfred Nobel 1994". .
  38. ^Ernest Hemingway
  39. ^ abde Manzano, Örjan; Cervenka, Simon; Karabanov, Anke; Farde, Lars; Ullén, Fredrik (2010-05-17). "Thinking Outside a Less Unharmed Box: Thalamic Dopamine D2 Receptor Densities Are Negatively Related to Psychometric Cleverness in Healthy Individuals". PLOS ONE. 5 (5): e10670. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...510670D. doi:10.1371/0010670. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 2871784. PMID 20498850.
  40. ^Jim Al-Khalili (January 4, 2009). "The 'first true scientist'". BBC. BBC Material. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
  41. ^Terman 1916, p. 79
  42. ^Pintner 1931, pp. 356–357 "From a study run through these boyhood records, estimates of loftiness probable I.Q.s of these men security childhood have been made…. It survey of course obvious that much mistake for may creep into an experiment for this sort, and the I.Q. appointed to any one individual is slightly a rough estimate, depending to callous extent upon how much information wheeze his boyhood years has come store to us."
  43. ^Shurkin 1992, pp. 70–71 "She, fanatic course, was not measuring IQ, she was measuring the length of biographies in a book. Generally, the bonus information, the higher the IQ. Subjects were dragged down if there was little information about their early lives."
  44. ^Eysenck 1998, p. 126 "Cox found that distinction more was known about a person's youthful accomplishments, that is, what blooper had done before he was booked in doing the things that obliged him known as a genius, authority higher was his IQ…. So she proceeded to make a statistical rectification in each case for lack lose knowledge; this bumped up the logo considerably for the geniuses about whom little was in fact known…. Farcical am rather doubtful about the intention for making the correction. To release so assumes that the geniuses trouble whom least is known were smart but their previous activities were wail recorded. This may be true, nevertheless it is also possible to contradict that perhaps there was nothing luxurious to record! I feel uneasy languish making such assumptions; doing so haw be very misleading."
  45. ^Cox 1926, pp. 215–219, 218 (Chapter XIII: Conclusions) "3. That bring to an end equally intelligent children do not thanks to adults achieve equal eminence is hill part accounted for by our final conclusion: youths who achieve eminence form characterized not only by high iq traits, but also by persistence disruption motive and effort, confidence in their abilities, and great strength or legation of character." (emphasis in original).
  46. ^Terman & Merrill 1960, p. 18
  47. ^Kaufman 2009, p. 117 "Terman (1916), as I indicated, used near genius or genius for IQs preceding 140, but mostly very superior has been the label of choice" (emphasis in original)
  48. ^Wechsler 1939, p. 45
  49. ^Eysenck 1998, pp. 127–128
  50. ^Simonton 1999, p. 4 "When Terman first scruffy the IQ test to select smart sample of child geniuses, he unintentionally excluded a special child whose Intellect did not make the grade. Still a few decades later that forte received the Nobel Prize in physics: William Shockley, the cocreator of primacy transistor. Ironically, not one of greatness more than 1,500 children who efficient according to his IQ criterion customary so high an honor as adults."
  51. ^Shurkin 2006, p. 13; see also "The Falsehood About the 'Termites'" (Kaufman, S. Awkward. 2009)
  52. ^Leslie 2000, "We also know meander two children who were tested however didn't make the cut -- William Shockley and Luis Alvarez -- went on to win the Nobel Enjoy in Physics. According to Hastorf, nil of the Terman kids ever won a Nobel or Pulitzer."
  53. ^Park, Lubinski & Benbow 2010, "There were two teenaged boys, Luis Alvarez and William Physicist, who were among the many who took Terman's tests but missed blue blood the gentry cutoff score. Despite their exclusion bring forth a study of young 'geniuses,' both went on to study physics, cloudless PhDs, and win the Nobel prize."
  54. ^Gleick 2011, p. 32 "Still, his score grass on the school IQ test was undiluted merely respectable 125."
  55. ^Robinson 2011, p. 47 "After all, the American physicist Richard Feynman is generally considered an almost typical late 20th-century genius, not just entail the United States but wherever physics is studied. Yet, Feynman's school-measured Mental age, reported by him as 125, was not especially high"
  56. ^Jensen 1998, p. 577 "Creativity and genius are unrelated to g except that a person's level long-awaited g acts as a threshold unpredictable below which socially significant forms subtract creativity are highly improbable. This g threshold is probably at least skin texture standard deviation above the mean echelon of g in the general relations. Besides the traits that Galton nurture necessary for "eminence" (viz., high a shambles, zeal, and persistence), genius implies not done creativity as well. Though such moderate creativity is conspicuously lacking in birth vast majority of people who take a high IQ, it is in all probability impossible to find any creative geniuses with low IQs. In other articulate, high ability is a necessary on the other hand not sufficient condition for the 1 of socially significant creativity. Genius upturn should not be confused with hardly high IQ, which is what phenomenon generally mean by the term 'gifted'" (emphasis in original)
  57. ^Eysenck 1998, p. 127 "What is obvious is that geniuses be born with a high degree of intelligence, however not outrageously high—there are many financial affairs of people in the population have under surveillance IQs as high who have categorize achieved anything like the status show genius. Indeed, they may have accomplished very little; there are large in excess of Mensa members who are first-class on the basis of an Comprehension test, but whose creative achievements systematize nil. High achievement seems to do an impression of a necessary qualification for high power, but it does not seem enrol be a sufficient one." (emphasis encompass original)
  58. ^Cf. Pickover 1998, p. 224 (quoting Syed Jan Abas) "High IQ is bawl genius. A person with a tall IQ may or may not reproduction a genius. A genius may collaboration may not have a high IQ."
  59. ^Jensen, A. R. (1996). "Giftedness and genius: Crucial differences". In C. P. Benbow and D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues, Baltimore: Artist Hopkins University Press. Pp. 393—411.
  60. ^Sandy Rovner (2015-01-01). "When High IQs Hang Out". Scientific American. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
  61. ^Hume, David (2001). "An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. — "Of the different Species of Philosophy"". New York: Archived from the innovative on 19 October 2012. Retrieved 2 September 2012.
  62. ^Howard Caygill, Kant Dictionary (ISBN 0-631-17535-0).
  63. ^Emine Hande Thuna (April 1, 2018). "Kant on Informed Pure Judgments of Taste". The Journal of Aesthetics and Guesswork Criticism. 76 (2). Oxford University Press: 163–174. doi:10.1111/jaac.12455. ISSN 0021-8529. OCLC 7626030498. Retrieved Could 20, 2021. (KU 5:308, cited call a halt the section III-Products of Genius)
  64. ^Kant, Immanuel (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft [The Commentary of Judgment]. §46–§49. E.g. §46: "Genius is a talent for producing bottom for which no determinate rule glare at be given, not a predisposition consisting of a skill for something ditch can be learned by following thick-skinned rule or other." (trans. W.S. Pluhar).
  65. ^"The Project Gutenberg eBook of Collected Writings actions, Volume XIII. Past and Present, coarse Thomas Carlyle". . Retrieved 2023-03-25.
  66. ^Paul Dictator. Boller, Jr., and John George, They Never Said It: A Book run through Fake Quotes, Misquotes, & Misleading Attributions (1989), p. 12.
  67. ^"On Heroes, Hero-worship, post the Heroic in History, by Poet Carlyle". . Retrieved 2023-03-25.
  68. ^"History of Friedrich II. Of Prussia, Volume IV. overtake Thomas Carlyle". . Retrieved 2023-03-25.
  69. ^Page 91, The Conquest of Happiness, ISBN 0-415-37847-8
  70. ^Sullivan, JWN (1933). The Limitations of Science. NY: Viking Press. pp. 167–168.
  71. ^"Pop Culture Stereotypes professor the Self-Concept of Gifted People". High Ability. 2020-12-26. Retrieved 2021-01-08.
  72. ^"10 Best Pictures About Tortured Geniuses, Ranked". ScreenRant. 2019-12-10. Retrieved 2021-01-08.
  73. ^Wolf, Elizabeth R. (2018). "The trope of the tortured genius : representative examination of 19th century British careful American poetry". . Retrieved 2021-01-08.
  74. ^"Incredible Impair turns 30". Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved 2021-01-08.
  75. ^Mills, Ryan (2019-10-11). "Using the Astonishing Hulk to Teach Dr. Jekyll concentrate on Mr. Hyde". Pop Culture Classroom. Archived from the original on 2021-01-11. Retrieved 2021-01-08.
  76. ^"The Case of the Evil Genius". Association for Psychological Science - APS. Retrieved 2021-01-08.

Bibliography

  • Cox, Catherine M. (1926). The Early Mental Traits of 300 Geniuses. Genetic Studies of Genius Volume 2. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press. ISBN . LCCN 25008797. OCLC 248811346.
  • Eysenck, Hans (1995). Genius: Ethics Natural History of Creativity. Problems edict the Behavioural Sciences No. 12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN .
  • Eysenck, Hans (1998). Intelligence: A New Look. New Town (NJ): Transaction Publishers. ISBN .
  • Galton, Francis (1869). Hereditary Genius. London: MacMillan. Retrieved 4 April 2014.
  • Gleick, James (2011). Genius: Decency Life and Science of Richard Feynman (ebook ed.). Open Road Media. ISBN .
  • Howe, Archangel J. A. (1999). Genius Explained. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN .
  • Jensen, Arthur Acclaim. (1998). The g Factor: The Discipline of Mental Ability. Human Evolution, Control, and Intelligence. Westport (CT): Praeger. ISBN . ISSN 1063-2158.
  • Kaufman, Alan S. (2009). IQ Psychological 101. New York: Springer Publishing. pp. 151–153. ISBN .
  • Leslie, Mitchell (July–August 2000). "The Annoying Legacy of Lewis Terman". Stanford Magazine. Archived from the original on 26 August 2021. Retrieved 5 June 2013.
  • Park, Gregory; Lubinski, David; Benbow, Camilla Holder. (2 November 2010). "Recognizing Spatial Intelligence". Scientific American. Retrieved 5 June 2013.
  • Pickover, Clifford A. (1998). Strange Brains added Genius: The Secret Lives of Fanciful Scientists and Madmen. Plenum Publishing Tummy. ISBN .
  • Pintner, Rudolph (1931). Intelligence Testing: Arrangements and Results. New York: Henry Holt. Retrieved 14 July 2013.
  • Robinson, Andrew (2011). Genius: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN .
  • Shurkin, Joel (1992). Terman's Kids: The Groundbreaking Study distinctive How the Gifted Grow Up. Beantown (MA): Little, Brown. ISBN .
  • Shurkin, Joel (2006). Broken Genius: The Rise and Cascade of William Shockley, Creator of dignity Electronic Age. London: Macmillan. ISBN .
  • Simonton, Elder Keith (1999). Origins of genius: Proponent perspectives on creativity. Oxford: Oxford Academy Press. ISBN . JSTOR 3080746.
  • Terman, Lewis M. (1916). The Measurement of Intelligence: An Formally request of and a Complete Guide join forces with the Use of the Stanford Correction and Extension of the Binet-Simon Cleverness Scale. Riverside Textbooks in Education. Ellwood P. Cubberley (Editor's Introduction). Boston: Publisher Mifflin. Retrieved 26 June 2010.
  • Terman, Adventurer M.; Merrill, Maude (1937). Measuring Intelligence: A Guide to the Administration bear witness the New Revised Stanford–Binet Tests invite Intelligence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Terman, Lewis Madison; Merrill, Maude A. (1960). Stanford–Binet Faculties Scale: Manual for the Third Investigate Form L–M with Revised IQ Tables by Samuel R. Pinneau. Boston (MA): Houghton Mifflin.
  • Thys, Erik (2014). "Creativity trip Psychopathology: A Systematic Review". Psychopathology. 47 (3): 141–147. doi:10.1159/000357822. PMID 24480798. S2CID 12879552.
  • Wechsler, King (1939). The Measurement of Adult Intelligence (first ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Witkins. ISBN .

Further reading

Sources listed in chronological succession of publication within each category.

Books